Unused sales suppression tools can still trigger penalties
HMRC has published a new compliance factsheet explaining the penalties that can apply where a business possesses an electronic sales suppression (ESS) tool, even if it has never actually been used to suppress a sale. What do you need to know?
The new compliance factsheet explains that ESS broadly involves software, hardware or other tools capable of hiding or reducing transactions recorded by an electronic till or point-of-sale system. HMRC says that “possession” is not limited to owning such a tool. It can also include having access to it, or attempting to access it.
Where HMRC suspects that a business is in possession of an ESS tool, it will normally require the business to remove it or stop using it and satisfy HMRC that this has been done. Failure to comply can result in an initial penalty of up to £1,000, followed by daily penalties of up to £75 until HMRC is satisfied that the tool is no longer available. Where an ESS penalty has already been charged within the previous five years, HMRC says the full £1,000 penalty will be imposed immediately, and the daily penalty will normally be £75. Separate penalties may also arise where the tool has actually been used to suppress sales and tax has been understated.
The important point is that HMRC does not need to establish that sales have actually been hidden before a possession penalty can arise. This makes the rules particularly relevant to businesses using electronic till or point-of-sale systems where suppression functionality may be available even if it has never been used. Businesses that receive an HMRC approach concerning their till software should therefore establish exactly what functionality is available and act quickly to remove any ESS capability. Being able to demonstrate that the tool has been removed may also be important in preventing daily penalties from continuing.
Related Topics
-
Accounting for VAT if there is no cash payment
Your business has submitted repayment returns for the last two quarters and you are concerned that you might have underpaid output tax on some supplies where no money has changed hands. Are your concerns justified?
-
Treatment of distributions under review
The government has launched a consultation on modernising the tax treatment of distributions and repayments of capital by companies. The proposals could affect the distinction between dividends taxed as income and capital payments subject to CGT. What changes are being considered?
-
Tax relief on equipment you haven’t paid for (yet)
The timing of tax relief for purchases of equipment isn’t straightforward when payments are delayed or goods are purchased through hire purchase (HP) agreements. How can you use these rules to your advantage and get tax relief before you’ve paid the final invoice?