HMRC writes to non-domiciled taxpayers following rule changes
HMRC has begun issuing “one-to-many” letters to individuals affected by recent changes to the tax rules for non-UK domiciled taxpayers. The letters prompt recipients to review their tax position under the new regime. What does this mean if you receive one?
The letters are being sent to taxpayers who HMRC believes may be impacted by the changes to how foreign income and gains are taxed. With the revised rules now in force, affected individuals may need to reassess how their overseas income is reported and taxed. Recipients are encouraged to consider how the new regime applies to their circumstances and to take action where necessary. This may include reviewing existing arrangements or seeking advice to ensure compliance under the updated rules.
Although the letters do not constitute a formal enquiry, they indicate that HMRC is actively identifying individuals within scope of the changes. As with other “one-to-many” communications, they are intended to prompt voluntary review and early action. For affected individuals, the key point is to treat the letter as a prompt to reassess their position under the new rules rather than ignore it. Addressing any issues early can help avoid complications or penalties later.
Related Topics
-
Mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind delayed
The government has revised plans to introduce the mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind from 6 April 2027, which will now be limited to company cars, vans, fuel and medical benefits. What's the full story?
-
Personal vs company donation to charity
You’re an owner manager and want to make a £5,000 donation to a local charity. You’ve claimed income tax relief under the gift aid scheme for smaller amounts but could it be more tax efficient to make the donation via the company?
-
Uber loses VAT margin scheme appeal
The Court of Appeal has ruled that Uber cannot use the Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) when accounting for VAT on its ride-hailing services. The decision could have significant implications for businesses that act as intermediaries when supplying services to consumers. What was the dispute about?