HMRC targets “significant” shareholders
HMRC is sending “nudge” letters to people that have significant control of a company. Why is this happening and what should you do if you receive a letter?
Nudge letters are being increasingly used by HMRC in recent years. They are generally sent to individuals that HMRC thinks may not have fully declared their income, and are a kind of informal “prompt” to take action if needed. The latest campaign is targeting people that appear on the persons of significant control (PSC) register if either:
- less than £100,000 of income was declared on their 2020/21 tax return; or
- they are not submitting self-assessment tax returns.
Of course, it is perfectly possible to be a PSC and have little to no income from the company to declare, e.g. shareholders of a company that isn’t trading, or is making losses meaning no dividends are being paid out so receipt of a letter doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve done anything wrong. Nonetheless, the number of letters is likely to be significant. So what should you do if you receive one?
If you have not been completing self-assessment tax returns, you can check whether you need to here. If you are already within self-assessment but haven’t declared any taxable benefits received from the company, receipt of a share option or a disposal of shares, the letter should instruct you to amend your 2020/21 tax return. The deadline for doing so is 31 January 2023, but ideally you should pay any outstanding tax as soon as possible to avoid further late payment interest charges.
Related Topics
-
IHT planning with the family home
You want to take steps to reduce your inheritance tax (IHT) exposure but most of your wealth is tied up in your home. You don’t want to downsize anytime soon so which tax planning options could help you?
-
Deadline to pay Class 1A NIC
-
Supreme Court finds LLP asset managers are not influencers
The Supreme Court has ruled that portfolio managers at a hedge fund did not have significant influence over the affairs of a limited liability partnership (LLP) and as such fell squarely within the salaried members rules. How does this decision impact LLPs across the board?