Furlough scheme winding down
From 1 July 2021, employers must now pay part of employees’ furlough wages as the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) starts to wind down. What's the full story?
For claim periods ending on or before 30 June 2021 employers could claim from the CJRS 80% of an employee’s usual wages for hours not worked, up to a maximum of £2,500 per month, and only needed to cover the employers’ NI and auto-enrolment pension contributions. However, for claim periods from 1 July 2021, the level of government grant under the CJRS is being gradually reduced and employers must now contribute towards the cost of r furloughed employees’ wages as follows:
- July - government contribution to wages for hours not worked: 70% up to a cap of £2.187.50; employer contribution to wages for hours not worked: 10% up to a cap of £312.50.
- August - government contribution to wages for hours not worked: 60% up to a cap of £1,875; employer contribution to wages for hours not worked: 20% up to a cap of £625.
- September - government contribution to wages for hours not worked: 60% up to a cap of £1,875; employer contribution to wages for hours not worked: 20% up to a cap of £625.
Employers must also still pay the employers’ NI and auto-enrolment pension contributions.
Furloughed employee will therefore continue to receive 80% of their usual wages, up to the cap of £2,500 per month, for the time they spend on furlough, but their wage payment is now partly funded by the employer. The CJRS is then due to come to an end on 30 September 2021.
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?