Criteria for self-assessment are changing
Historically, you may have had to file a tax return if your income exceeded the point where the personal allowance starts to be tapered away. This has changed for 2023/24. However, the Autumn Statement also made a further change that will apply from 2024/25. What’s the full story?
If your tax affairs are relatively straightforward, it can be very frustrating to have to complete a tax return every year. In the past, HMRC has insisted on issuing returns for the following reasons, irrespective of other circumstances:
- Income exceeds £100,000 (the personal allowance abatement threshold);
- There is a liability to the high income child benefit charge (HICBC);
- The individual is a company director.
HMRC now accepts that being a company director is not a valid reason to issue a tax return in and of itself. For 2023/24, it was announced that the income threshold would increase to £150,000, meaning you may be able to request your return for this year be withdrawn if the only reason you have been in self-assessment was that your earnings were more than £100,000. However, the other criteria for self-assessment remain unchanged, so if you have earnings of, say, £120,000 but also have untaxed income of £5,000, you will still need to complete a return.
The 2023 Autumn Statement announced that for 2024/25 the income threshold will be removed altogether. The government is also intending to allow those liable to the HICBC to pay it via a PAYE coding adjustment, though there is no current timetable for this.
Related Topics
-
IHT planning with the family home
You want to take steps to reduce your inheritance tax (IHT) exposure but most of your wealth is tied up in your home. You don’t want to downsize anytime soon so which tax planning options could help you?
-
Deadline to pay Class 1A NIC
-
Supreme Court finds LLP asset managers are not influencers
The Supreme Court has ruled that portfolio managers at a hedge fund did not have significant influence over the affairs of a limited liability partnership (LLP) and as such fell squarely within the salaried members rules. How does this decision impact LLPs across the board?